It approaches three years marking the murder of George
Floyd. At the time, a seismic shift in the architecture paradigm procceded to follow, thrusting individuals whoses double conciousness seperated their ‘self’ with their ‘architect’ into the forefront. To be both ‘Black’ and an
‘Architect’ was now to
confront an education that either we had to riot with its resistant or accept its pedagogy steeped ignorance.
Taxed with the onus to either alter or disprove a narrative of the once
singular architectural education, the daily studio day-to-day was now a daily
act of protest. Our projects were now political. Even if you didn’t intend it
to be, they were politicised. One’s choice to
do or to not do projects in
‘Africa’, or about ‘Blackness’ held weight, not just for the project itself, but for our identities, our mentors, our academic units, and our institutions. Architectural exploration became arduous for
the ‘others’. At the core, each architectural student is made up of
a dichotomy between their ‘self’ and their ‘education’.
The prior, is built from one's cultural heritage and personal
experience, it is what determines the questions one chooses to ask. The latter,
defined by our education, commands in whose library you choose (or restricted)
to find the answer. For diasporic architectural
students, frequently their authentic questions don’t yet have authentic answers
in this education. And whilst it is as true ‘its not [our] job to educate you’, the new
young diasporic generation are left burdened with additional non-curricular
work, left to spell out evident architectural past to prove decolonial ideas
of architecture exist and work over hollow rebuttal. While the refrain 'it's not our job to educate you' holds true, the burden falls disproportionately on the shoulders of the new generation of diasporic architects. We're tasked with not only articulating the glaring omissions in architectural history but also defending decolonial ideas against dismissive rebuttals. Even when a we students managed to push our innovative ideas forward, securing their approval for our vision, you find themselves buried under the weight of architectural etiquette. By the time the green light is given, countless folio pages have been filled, months have slipped away, and there's often scant time left to live out our imagination beyond their ficitious history.
As a tutor now, I look back at this time with more hindsight and want to say ‘To breach boundaries into our imagination calls for a
little bit of disobedience’. As a tutor too, I remember the copious amount of reading we do, so in short, here are the five practices, do with them what you
will, I used to bypass the British pedagogy of teaching which allowed me to live out my imagination in my masters.
1 - If your architectural institution
doesn’t look at you, look beyond your institutionProblem: When tracing spatial
practices and forms of other identities in the British architectural education
framework is the lack of references. Its libraries, the seminars and studio
culture are yet to have the answers to a problem it does not understand. As a
result, education fails to see you.
Suggestion: As a solution, look beyond
your institution, and the architectural discipline. Boundaries must be crossed.
Architecture is the only creative discipline not mentioned in Stuart Hall's New
ethnicities essay when talking about the potential transformation creative
representation has - film, theatre, music, art and dance - when addressing
‘difference’. Find
resources in other creative disciplines and question how you can convert them
into spatial principles. To learn outside of architecture, is also to learn truly the disciplines
borders are not so precisely singular as our pedagogy teaches us. And this
discovery to a diasporic identity, I found was somewhat liberating.
2 -Validate contemporary references
Problem: As a ‘self actualized people’ - a
term I found in the War inna Babylon exhibition at the Institute of Contemporary Arts early this year. Many students, like me,
who are second or third generation immigrants have quite recent identities. On one side we
were educated and raised here, so were ‘British’ in many regards, yet it was
not reflected in their daily living conditions. On the other side, we divorce
ourselves from the conservations, expectations and generational values of our
migrant parents since our ‘home’ is not somewhere else. This not either or,
spearheaded the construction of Black Britain’s consciousness and identity.
Suggestion: If the architecture one is
researching is as contemporary as an identity such as this one. Validate
Contemporary references. Don’t sleep on Instagram, nor think that the FKA twigs
Sad day’s video of kung fu fighting amidst an East London council estate or the
Film Joy by Samona Olanipekun of the upbringing of Nigerian culture in London cannot
be a validate architecture expression as much as a reference communicated in British
education for over 60 years. [Read: Cook] Truth is,
these references are more relevant to us, their use of spatial movement,
lighting, and composition have an energy sometimes the british architectural
pedagogy is yet to put into words.
3 - Satire
Problem: When one faces a project about ‘race’ and
‘difference’, it can include a heavy amount of politics and pressure that the
institutions can not comprehend yet which can be stifling.
Solution: Many people of color will already understand
the use of Humor to understand, interpret and deal with race. As much as Humor
can disempower, humor can offer opportunities to empower and to acknowledge a
problem that is yet to find answers. (
Bowers, 2005). (
Andronoviene, 2014) or to shift situations
from the negative to the positive, or create a context outside of realities and
its political dialogue and imagine an alternative where ambiguities and
qualities of critical race theory can be discussed and lead to inter-racial catharsis. It is okay that your project’s primary audience is
you.
For example,
Satire was used in this project via the Trinidad born, British film-maker
Horace Ove’s Black Safari. A satire documentary which takes all the big trops
of traditional white exploration of the ‘dark continent’ and reverses
them. When mimicking this idea into
architectural project development, one was able to create a france to a
playground so to speak, to allow for my project to existed afar from certain
parameters of realties, it was ignorance of the truth, instead it allowed for
one to move forward with imagination instead of readdressing history.
4 - Architecture is as much spatial
practice as it is spatial form. Dance and movement is as much architecture as
the buildings they are performed in.
Problem: For many dwelling into non-colonial
architecture, the theories of spatial practice become ever more interesting,
yet one might be met with the question ‘But, where is the architecture’.
Solution: Remember, previous I said, At the core, each
architectural student is made up of two parts: their ‘self’ and their
‘education’. The prior, is built from
one's cultural heritage and personal experience, it is what determines the
questions one chooses to ask. The latter, defined by our education, commands in
whose library you choose (or enforced) to find the answer. Lesley Lokko
puts it ‘The Zulu term for an architect, umqambi wesino, is a haunting and beautifully complex
phrase, meaning alternatively and in no particular order “magician of space”,
“maker of a situation”, or “maker of a sensation”.’
5- State your history, but don’t feel
the need to prove it
History is not something solely in the past, or even
primarily. The burden we ‘other’ architectural practitioners have to face when
asked to (re)address history is also the very proof that people carry history;
it is present in all our work, it is history that defines our identities, our
perspectives and our imagination. I found that instead of trying to prove a
past, state what your history is and move on.
Issi Nanabeyin
2021